Knight Foundation

During last year’s mid-term elections, the Knight-funded Wesleyan Media Project provided real-time analysis of the 1.6 million political ads aired on behalf of state and federal candidates. Together they cost a record breaking $735 million – and comprised the most negative campaign in history, the project found. Tomorrow at 10 a.m. EDT, watch online as the project’s leaders delve into how they went about their analysis. The seminar is being livestreamed here. Knight Foundation President and CEO Alberto Ibargüen, a Wesleyan alum, will speak along with Assistant Government Professor Erika Franklin Fowler.

This post is the third in a series about a Knight Foundation roundtable that brought together news start-ups and tech entrepreneurs. A report is forthcoming.  Journalists are notoriously averse to math, but there’s no equation in which nonprofit news organizations can survive for the long term without a steady mix of revenue.  The more diversified a revenue portfolio, the greater promise of stability. So the business objective for local news nonprofits has moved beyond foundation grants and major giving to multiple revenue streams. How best to get there was a central question at the Knight Foundation’s May 6 roundtable meeting of nonprofit news organizations, tech entrepreneurs and researchers.  Generally...

Over time, we’ve noticed a growing myth about media grant making – that the outcomes aren’t quantifiable, that it doesn’t produce a tangible, measurable impact. In a new report, the International Center for Journalists offers 20 plus reasons to the contrary. That’s how many changes to government policies were brought to bear by the work of fellows. For example, in Kenya, a series on shoddy care in public hospitals resulted in $7.5 million to improve care; Indonesia, a series on medical waste prompted the government to order hospitals to build their own wastewater treatment facilities; and in Peru, after crimes by unlicensed cab drivers are exposed, taxis were required to show official identification How did 19 fellows accomplish so much in such a short time? ICFJ made major changes to its flagship program, the Knight International Journalism Fellows. The center extended the fellowships to at least a year, recruited international fellows and targeted developing countries where the opportunity for impact was greatest. Along the way, we also made some important discoveries about what works: Strong journalism skills are not enough to ensure a fellow’s success. The most effective fellows are entrepreneurs with solidmanagement skills needed to lead complex projects in difficult environments. High-impact projects need a strong commitment from local partners. We need to get buy-in, not just from top management at our partner organizations, but also from those working most closely with the fellow. By putting their own resources into the project, local partners have a stake in its success. Projects are more likely to be successful in stable countries with a relatively high level of media freedom. Projects focusing on digital journalism are more likely to produce lasting impact. Mobile phones reach many more people in developing countries than other media. Authoritarian regimes tend to regulate traditional media more than the Internet. Fellows have greater success the longer they are in the field. But we ask only the strongest fellows to extend. Language fluency is essential for success. Previous experience working in a country is not. Innovations developed by Knight fellows can be replicated in other ICFJ programs. By sharing this report, we hope that others in the field can learn from it – and that they too will share their best practices and lessons learned. Eric Newton Senior Adviser to the President, Knight Foundation and Joyce Barnathan president, ICFJ