Community Impact – Page 19 – Knight Foundation

A new Knight Foundation report finds that chronic non-voters’ news diet may help shape whether or not they vote on Nov. 3.

In 2016, with the presidency and both houses of Congress in play, close to 100 million eligible voters chose to sit out the election, making nonvoters a larger constituency than either the Democratic or Republican voter bases. This fall, will nonvoters continue to sit out what could be the most consequential presidential election in recent memory? The answer may lie on whether their consumption of media could translate into their willingness to cast a ballot.

A new Knight Foundation report, “The 100 Million Project: How media habits relate to voter participation,” released today holds answers to this critical question. The report draws from the original 100 Million Project survey of over 12,000 nonvoters and a companion survey of over 1,000 active voters. This report explores the media habits of 4,000 nationally representative non-voters, and 1,000 voters that were part of the original 100 Million project. It explores how their media consumption habits may impact their attitudes toward politics, elections and voting in the 2020 race.

The report reveals major divisions within the eligible but non-voting population based on their media diet. These factors—which include age, preferred news sources, partisanship, social media reliance and more—may help determine who will cast a ballot in November and who will occupy the White House.

Here’s our key findings:

  • Chronic nonvoters who are more attentive to news may change their voting behavior this year. The 33% of nonvoters who say they’re attentive to the news are also more likely to say they’ll vote in the fall.
  • Conservative news consumers are more fired up to vote in 2020. Nonvoters who turn to right-leaning news outlets are more likely to say they’ll vote this year than those who rely on left-leaning outlets or centrist media. Sixty percent of conservative news-watchers say so, versus 53% of liberal news-watchers.
  • People who rely on social media for news are less likely to vote. People who say they get their news mostly from social media are consistently less likely to vote and more skeptical about the efficacy of voting. Those who rely chiefly on social media are also among the least likely to be registered to vote—just 71% versus 84% of newspaper readers.
  • Young nonvoters are more likely to passively “bump into” news, rather than seeking it out. Among voters ages 25 to 29, just 46% say they actively seek out news, with most saying they typically “bump into” news, primarily on social media.
  • People are more engaged with national news than local news. Both nonvoters and voters say they feel more knowledgeable about national affairs than about what’s happening in their local community. Seventy-one percent of these “nationally knowledgeable” nonvoters say they have enough info to vote in the fall, but they are less likely to be civically engaged in their local communities.

Exercising the basic civic act of voting is a core function of our democracy. That’s why Knight launched this survey—to find out about the correlation between media consumption and voter turnout, and what implications might be for cultivating an informed and participative citizenry. The findings offer reasons for cautious optimism for turnout in 2020: Not every nonvoter is entirely disenchanted with political participation, and among those who are most sanguine, news plays a big role in their lives. 

On the other hand, a warning: As younger adults find their place in our democratic society, this report finds that the media they consume—driven largely by social media and their informal networks—is playing a lead role in shaping their political knowledge. It’s not yet clear whether these young nonvoters’ news diets will spur them to greater electoral participation, or encourage them to remain on the sidelines in 2020 and beyond.

###


Evetter Alexander is director of learning and impact at the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. To be connected with Evette for interview, please contact Tony Franquiz at [email protected] or 202-374-5393.


The media environment during an election year has the potential to guide citizens toward informed participation in the democratic process. It can also turn people off from voting altogether. It can enlighten or mislead the electorate—sometimes doing both at once. 

In February 2020, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation released the 100 Million Project, a landmark study that surveyed 12,000 chronic non-voters nationally and in ten swing states in order to explore the underlying challenges of electoral participation. Americans who don’t vote in elections—approaching 100 million and comprising roughly 43% of eligible voters as of the last presidential election in 2016—differ from active voters along a wide range of attitudes and behaviors related to voting, elections and politics. 

This new report was commissioned to explore the relationship between the self-reported media habits of these non-voters and their attitudes toward voting, the 2020 election and other forms of civic engagement. Findings are drawn from the nationally representative samples of 4,002 persistent non-voters ages 25 and older and 1,002 active registered voters from the original 100 Million Project survey.

This study reveals new insights into the media habits of American non-voters, and uncovers how their information diets might impact their democratic participation. This new analysis is instructive for those seeking to foster a more informed and engaged citizenry.

Nonvoters’ media consumption habits may help determine turnout in 2020

article
Nonvoters’ media consumption habits may help determine turnout in 2020

Key findings include: 

  • Non-voters who are attentive to the news—the 33% who identify news rather than entertainment as the primary media they consume—are more likely to say they’ll vote in the 2020 presidential election. 
  • Non-voters who turn to partisan-leaning news outlets, particularly conservative ones, are more likely than those who rely on centrist media outlets to say they’ll cast a ballot in November. 
  • Social media and word of mouth via friends and family—two sources of news for many non-voters— are consistently tied to lower likelihood of voting in the future, more skeptical views about the efficacy of voting and lower community engagement overall. 
  • Fewer than half (46%) of younger non-voters—ages 25–29—say they actively seek out news, with a majority saying that instead they typically “bump into” news as they go about their day. In contrast, voters in the same age group are nearly 20 percentage points more likely to say they seek out their news, placing them close to on par with voters of other age groups. 
  • Non-voters and voters are both more likely to feel more knowledgeable about national affairs than about what’s happening in their local communities. The “nationally knowledgeable” members of both groups are more likely to say they’ll vote in the fall, while being less likely, by some measures, to be civically engaged in their local communities.

This report details the relationships between non-voters’ news engagement and their likelihood of voting, views about the process, feelings about the impact of voting and other community engagement traits. It also explores the news media diets of several key demographic groups of non-voters, highlighting central findings for these groups in the body of the report (detailed tables are available in the Appendix). 

The findings offer reasons for optimism—not every non-voter is entirely disenchanted with political participation, and among those who are most sanguine, news plays a big role in their lifestyles. On the other hand, a warning: As younger adults and the generations that follow them find their place in a democratic society, the media they consume—driven by social media and their informal networks—is clearly playing a lead role in shaping their political knowledge. It is not yet clear whether or how these media diets will equip Americans on the sidelines to participate in this most critical civic duty. 


Photo (top) by Gnider Tam on Unsplash

To provide direct consulting to five cities – Detroit, Macon, Miami, Philadelphia and Saint Paul  – on how to adapt to COVID-related budget shortfalls.

To support Give Miami Day 2020, a program of The Miami Foundation which engages community to support local nonprofit organizations through a 24-hour annual giving event.

To support the evolution of Talent Scout Miami into a freestanding, membership-based organization that connects pre-qualified individuals from diverse backgrounds with Miami-based technology companies.  

To support the growth of the School of Computing and Information Sciences (SCIS) at Florida International University as it seeks to become a leading school for computer science and engineering in Florida and the go-to talent pipeline for industry in the region.

To support community engagement in the planning and design of the Underdeck, a mile-long linear park created by I-395’s redesign.

To support a Black-led, community-owned grocery store that will spur commercial development in Detroit’s North End and surrounding neighborhoods.  

To build an architecturally significant community library and meeting space as part of a growing urban farm development in Detroit’s North End.

To support public and civic engagement in the design and execution of the Mayor’s Community-First Public Safety Initiative. 

To support a statewide collaboration of philanthropies to advance equity in Minnesota.